On Monday night, I watched my initially, The Previous Phrase host Lawrence O’Donnell.
When O’Donnell laudably tried to emphasis the audience’s interest onand hopefully previous, Charlie Sheen trainwreck interview, courtesy of the tragic undertow that threatens to pull Sheen under for decent, I was overtaken, not from the pulling around the thread, and therefore the voracious audience he serves. It didn’t make me sad, it produced me angry.

In the case of celebrities, we will be a heartless nation, basking within their misfortunes like nude sunbathers at Schadenfreude Beach. The impulse is understandable, to some diploma. It may possibly be grating to pay attention to complaints from men and women who appreciate privileges that the majority of us can not even visualize. If you ever cannot muster up some compassion for Charlie Sheen, who may make alot more capital for a day’s effort than most of us will make in a very decade’s time, I guess I cannot blame you.

Together with the speedy pace of activities on the internet and therefore the information revolution sparked through the World wide web, it is particularly hassle-free for the engineering marketplace to believe that it’s special: consistently breaking new ground and engaging in details that no person has at any time completed previous to.

But there can be other kinds of home business which have by now undergone a few of the very same radical shifts, and have just as fantastic a stake inside the long run.

Consider healthcare, for example.

We usually believe of it as a huge, lumbering beast, but in fact, medicine has undergone a series of revolutions during the previous 200 many years which might be not less than equal to people we see in technology and facts.

Less understandable, but nevertheless inside of the norms of human nature, would be the impulse to rubberneck, to slow down and have a look at the carnage of Charlie spectacle of Sheen’s unraveling, but of your blithe interviewer Sheen’s life as we pass it within the right lane of our daily lives. To be honest, it can be hard for customers to discern the big difference between a run-of-the-mill awareness whore, and an honest-to-goodness, circling the drain tragedy-to-be. On its personal merits, a quote like “I Am On a Drug. It’s Named Charlie Sheen” is sheer genius, and we can not all be anticipated to get the total measure of someone’s everyday living every last time we hear anything funny.

Extremely fast forward to 2011 and I am looking to take a look at implies of being a bit more business-like about my hobbies (typically audio). By the stop of January I had manned up and began to promote my blogs. I had generated many several weblogs, which had been contributed to by pals and colleagues. I promoted these activities by means of Facebook and Twitter.

Second: the tiny abomination that the Gang of Five around the Supream Court gave us a year or so ago (Citizens Inebriated) literally has slightly bouncing betty of its individual that can quite effectively go off while in the faces of Govs Wanker, Sacitch, Krysty, and J.O. Daniels. Seeing that this ruling extended the idea of “personhood” to each businesses and unions, to strive to deny them any correct to operate within just the legal framework that they have been organized below deprives these “persons” with the freedoms of speech, association and motion. Which means (the moment again, quoting law college educated family members) that either the courts need to uphold these rights for that unions (as person “persons” as guaranteed by the Federal (and most state) constitutions, or they have to declare that these attempts at stripping or limiting union rights really have to use to major firms, also.

For Every Entertainment Industry Job 'Lost' To Infringement, Could 12 Jobs Be Created Elsewhere?

from the fun-with-stats dept

For years we've debunked various entertainment industry studies claiming ridiculous job and economic "losses" from copyright infringement. These studies tend to have all sorts of problems; ignoring the ability to adapt and to introduce new business models, using "ripple effects" in just one direction to double, triple and quadruple count the same "losses" over and over again, and counting every download as a "lost sale." The ripple effects one is especially pernicious because the industry likes to pretend that the impacts of infringement only go in one direction. They ignore that the money not spent on such content doesn't disappear from the economy but can be used elsewhere -- perhaps in areas that provide greater economic growth.

A few years ago, the folks at CCIA smartly took the copyright industry's exact methodology and showed that for all the claims of how much copyright contributed to the economy, exceptions to copyright contributed even more. While the copyright maximalists totally missed the point and attacked the methodology -- not realizing that, in doing so, they had undermined their own methodology -- the point was made. If you believe the claims from the copyright industry, then you also have to believe that the exceptions are more important. The methodology is the same, so either neither are right or both are right.

It looks like Rick Falkvinge, of The Pirate Party, has now done something similar on the "job loss" side of things, and concluded that, using similar methodology to the industry reports, for every job "lost" by copyright infringement, the positive ripple effects in the other direction mean that 11.8 new jobs are created. So if we accept the claim that 1.2 million jobs can be lost due to infringement, it would mean that a separate 14.2 million jobs were created elsewhere.

The report broke down the "creative industry," by noting that (contrary to copyright maximalist claims), most of that industry doesn't actually rely on copyright to make money. In fact, certain "creative" industries could be seen as "copyright-inhibited." For example, advertising. As we constantly hear from copyright maximalists, various sites are making big bucks by using advertising in association with file sharing. So based on the industry's own argument, it seems that the advertising market is clearly copyright-inhibited, and it would grow if there was greater infringement. After going through the numbers, it was determined that the majority of GDP, by quite a bit, are likely in the "copyright-inhibited" arena.

Now, you can certainly argue with the methodology here. I don't think anyone actually believes these numbers are accurate. But it's using the same basic methodology, assumptions and thought processes behind the studies in the other direction. You can also, obviously, claim that Falkvinge is biased. He is. But is he more biased than the entertainment industry legacy players who do the other studies? It seems clear that the industries are likely to be more biased, since they have billions of dollars bet on keeping the old structures in place. I think both studies are probably far from accurate in all sorts of ways, but if you're going to cite the entertainment industry's claims based on this kind of methodology, it seems you should also have to accept these claims. Not doing so suggests serious cognitive dissonance or someone who is paid not to believe the truth.

100 Comments | Leave a Comment..

Welcome to Wise Bread's Best Money Tips Roundup! Today we found some awesome articles on 43 ways to save money, foods you don't need to buy organic, and how to keep your head after losing your job.

About Me 0120

Friday, March 11, 2011

Making Money Job

For Every Entertainment Industry Job 'Lost' To Infringement, Could 12 Jobs Be Created Elsewhere?

from the fun-with-stats dept

Top 5 Articles

Other Essential Reading

No comments:

Post a Comment